The land tax exemption is one of the country's tray populistlikumaid for the last four years, as the authors have made since the previous government's ownership of the excise tax increase and more and more expensive.
We are all expensive home, but now it is to be collectivized land tax changes, changing land tenure for all citizens as a cost.
I read the law "Home Owner's release land tax Land Tax Act Amendment Act, 51 SE" explanatory letter to the originators of the Union of Pro Patria and Res Publica and the Reform Party now want to reduce the cost of home. They even write: "Public authorities should encourage home ownership, not to punish." But why would they be nice to read since 2007. has been raised all kinds of taxes that make home living more expensive?
I recall only the largest home ownership more expensive for the tax changes made.
First, the district increased the tax 2007th The top 5 percent and 18 percent from 2009. Since 20 per cent. This means that the state now requires 3x more value-added tax for the people who live in apartments where the people who live in your house, because the central heating and heating materials (wood, coal, fuel oil) are more expensive. Estonia's climate is warm in an emergency room, not a matter of choice and, therefore, forced expenditure. The state is unethical to make people warm room and in top health.
Second, the excise tax imposed on natural gas for at least 367 kroons per 1000 cubic meters. Previously, it was 0, and many crossed over to natural gas because it was a cheaper alternative to other heating methods. Not anymore, because the country has ever promised that it may change your mind (for example, the second pillar pension fund contributions to freeze).
Third, increased 2009th In the summer less than a week-ahead VAT of 18 per cent to 20 per cent and the prices of all consumer products and services!
Fourth, the tax was raised three times the accommodation (which used to be 5 percent, but now 20 percent) was more expensive than overnight, or people. If the goal was to reduce the number of tourists, I can understand this behavior.
Fifth, the list of other excise tax increases or loss, which also affected home owners. Above all, the excise duty on electricity, which is due to the price of electricity since 2007. half-year increased. Fuel excise duty is increased by at least 36 percent. All current employees lost their retirement age by 2 years due to the lifting of their pension payments two years, according to the current average pension of 303 euros per month, or 3,636 euros or 7,272 euros per year for two years (113 000).
Current pensioners were left without a pension for free home delivery, the price is now 4.6 per month. They remain close, as well as funeral benefits without a funeral tripled tax. Compensation for loss of student loans to young people in public sector employment and student loan interest tax relief was abolished.
This is a list of revised charges, which increased the cost of living in your home since 2007. year, could continue. In this context, is downright insulting to the Government of the Union's proposal to change the smallest part of the expenditure account for the payment of land tax for the collective. First of all, walk away with the excise tax increases, and people with empty pockets, both now and then distributed back to Treasury few euros.
MP Jim said garment 18th May 2010, the division of taxes and money in the Riigikogu as follows: "Not one thing the government can not provide for its citizens, it has not previously been taken away from citizens. The state gets the lion's share of its revenues from the citizens and the citizens of the state gives nothing, then its value must take before these citizens. Exactly that. And any amount which the state wishes to provide further, he must also collect additional taxes. "
If someone goes beyond the payment of land tax, then obviously he is living beyond their means. It is also reasonable property tax because the state must ensure the preservation of property. It is entirely fair to the land and other property with the ongoing creation of national registers and maintaining costs are paid by the users or owners of the register. It also goes to national defense and indirect property tax (property of the occupation of another country) and the fire brigade.
It is dangerous, as it attempts to clear the subject of collectivized land tax for all taxpayers in the Republic of Estonia. Estonian taxpayers have already received Ärma sponsor would be dangerous and lead to similar expectations of the coalition of thousands of voters. As previously quoted, then "no matter the state can not provide for its citizens, it has not previously been taken away from citizens."
Article published in the 10th June 2011 delfi.ee arvamusartiklina:
http://www.delfi.ee/news/paevauudised/arvamus/virgo-kruve-valitsus-
-wants-collectivized land tax-the-making, our kodud.d? id = 47543075
